The 2011 NFL season is 1/4 of the way complete. How have your favorite teams done so far? I'll start with the NFC (by virtue of winning the Super Bowl last season). Tomorrow, the AFC.
NFC East
Washington 3-1 PF 83 PA 63 Div 1-1 Conf 3-1
Analysis: With the problematic Albert Haynesworth gone to the Patriots and the QB drama around Donovan McNabb the Vikings problem, the Redskins are looking great. But there are some issues. While they're win over the Giants is their best yet, they average 3.5 points better than their last 3 games. Despite being 2-1 over that time, their opponents are a combined 3-9. As long as Rex Grossman can improve on his 989 passing yards , 6 TDs without throwing 5 INTs, he should do just fine with the arsenal he has. And with London Fletcher leading the defense, the playoff race is bound to be interesting.
Next 4 weeks: BYE, PHI (1-3), @CAR (1-3), @ BUF (3-1)
What to expect: Be wary of the Eagles. Forget the fact that they are struggling right now. It's a division game and we all know what happens with those. Remember the 59-28 beat down last year at home? Yeah, just be careful of that wounded animal. As far as the Panthers and Bills are concerned, this could be a tough 2nd quarter for the Skins to come.
NY Giants 3-1 PF 102 PA 87 Div 1-1 Conf 3-1
Analysis: Despite the loss opening weekend to the Redskins 28-14, the G-Men have bounced back with 3 straight wins. Eli Manning's 105.6 QBR, along with the defense forcing 6 fumbles (recovering 4) has the New York area hoping for a deep run in the postseason in the near future. Hopefully they will not have a late season collapse like they did in 2009, but you never really know the way this season has gone.
Next 4 weeks: SEA (1-3), BUF (3-1), BYE, MIA (0-4)
What to expect: The Seahawks look easy, but the G-Men can take it to them (assuming they take the Hawks seriously). The new look Bills will be looking for Super Bowl revenge (Super Bowl XXV). Just don't be surprised to see a couple of losses in the next quarter. Especially against the winless Dolphins.
Dallas 2-2 PF 99 PA 101 Div 1-0 Conf 2-1
Analysis: Let's face it, the Cowboys should be 4-0. We can harp on Tony Romo's 4th quarter ineffectiveness all day, but let's not repeat that same old song. In spite of offensive and defensive miscues, the Boys should be happy just to be at .500. The comebacks are not just the quarterback's fault, this is a team game after all. Hope things look better in the 2nd quarter of the season.
Next 4 weeks: BYE, @NE (3-1), STL (0-4), @PHI (1-3)
What to expect: If you think that the next two games after the Patriots are a cake walk, think again. If the 4th quarter woes continue... you think Jerry Jones will be looking to Andrew Luck??
Philadelphia 1-3 PF 101 PA 101 Div 0-1 Conf 1-3
Analysis: What's up with the "dream team"? Ever since Michael Vick's return to Atlanta, the Eagles have struggled to say the least. Despite outgaining the opposition 1336-1094, they have managed to commit 3 turnovers (5 INTs, 4 Lost Fumbles) each of those games. Is it time to panic in the City of Brotherly Love? It's a long season, so don't call them a bust just yet.
Next 4 weeks: @BUF (3-1), @WAS (3-1), BYE, DAL (2-2)
What to expect: The Bills game should be a defining game that should supposedly swing the momentum back to the wins column. But their next two divisional opponents are going to be the real test. Don't let the record fool you, this Eagle team could be back on the rise.
NFC North
Detroit 4-0 PF 135 PA 76 Div 1-0 Conf 3-0
Analysis: People have been saying all along that if Matthew Stafford stays healthy, then watch out for the Lions. Even though they were outscored 40-3 in the 1st half in their last two contests, they've outscored the Vikings and Cowboys 57-13 afterwards. Could they go to 16-0 after going 0-16 3 years ago? That would be one hell of a story. Especially since the Tigers are back in the postseason.
Next 4 weeks: CHI (2-2), SF (3-1), ATL (2-2), @DEN (1-3)
What to expect: Just because their next three are at home doesn't mean it's easy. Especially with the Bears. It's a division game, which means that all the numbers don't matter. The 49ers and Falcons are no pushovers either. And if the Broncos actually show up to the game, this could be an interesting next quarter.
Green Bay 4-0 PF 148 PA 97 Div 1-0 Conf 3-0
Analysis: The defending champs are just dominating. Aaron Rodgers ranks 1st in completion percentage (73.1%) and QBR (124.6) while the tandem of James Starks/Ryan Grant average around 4.8 ypc (77 carries). The defense has been great forcing the opposition to turn the ball over 11 times is saying a lot.
Next 4 weeks: @ATL (2-2), STL (0-4), MIN (0-4), BYE
What to expect: At this rate, it may be a while until they lose. The champs are looking good so far. But if I were the Pack, I'd be weary of the Vikings. Just saying.
Chicago 2-2 PF 94 PA 98 Div 0-1 Conf 2-2
Analysis: Now that Mike Martz's play calling authority stripped, the Bears offense can find some balance. In their first three games managed to run the ball 51 times for a grand total of 161 yards. Against the Panthers on Sunday, 31 carries 224 yards. Looks like Jay Cutler might have a chance to play the whole season after all. But the fact that the defense has given up over 24 points a game is a serious concern. Especially for Lovie Smith and his job status.
Next 4 weeks: @DET (4-0), MIN (0-4), @TB(3-1), BYE
What to expect: The next two divisional games will be interesting to see. But I'm interested to see how the offense performs over the next three weeks without Martz and what changes the defense are going to make to improve their playoff odds.
Minnesota 0-4 PF 77 PA 96 Div 0-1 Conf 0-2
Analysis: Even with the changes in personnel, looks like the same ole Vikings team from last year. To be fair they started 1-3, only to finish with a terrible 6-10. Or maybe Donovan McNabb can get his act together and string 12 wins in a row. Not likely to happen, but miracles do happen. Even though the Purple People Eaters win the first half with a score of 61-16, the second half and beyond has been an awful 80-16. Remember, there are two halves to a football game.
Next 4 weeks: ARI (1-3), @CHI (2-2), GB (4-0), @CAR (1-3)
What to expect: If the Vikings can play with some passion and finish off opponents, they could break even by the 2nd quarter. The Cardinals should be easy, but not to be taken too lightly either. They'll have their work cut out for them against the Bears and Packers. The battle between McNabb (or Christian Ponder) and Cam Newton should be fun to watch.
NFC South
Tampa Bay 3-1 PF 84 PA 77 Div 1-0 Conf 2-1
Analysis: If Josh Freeman's first Monday Night game (25-39, 314 total YDS, 2 TDS (1 rushing)) wasn't any indication that the Buccaneers are for real, think again. The fact last year was no fluke is proving to be true. Especially with how young their roster is (only two players over the age of 30), this could be a dangerous team now and in the future to come.
Next 4 weeks: @SF (3-1), NO(3-1), CHI (2-2), BYE
What to expect: We'll have to wait to see what the Bucs can do on short rest when they face the 49ers. Assuming everything goes well, the Saints game will be real fun to watch. Not sure how the Bears D' will handle Freeman, LeGarrette Blount, Preston Parker, Kellen Winslow and the rest of this promising offense.
New Orleans 3-1 PF 127 PA 98 Div 0-0 Conf 1-1
Analysis: It looks like the Saints could be marching into the playoffs for the 3rd straight season. But when it comes down to facing teams that are above .500, they've allowed 75 points. Their lone win was against Houston at home 40-33 in week 3. As far as I'm concerned, the Saints still have Drew Brees at the helm (QBR 102.9), and the tandem of Mark Ingram/Pierre Thomas/Darren Sproles rushing for a combined 454 yards (over 95% of their rushing) to get them in good position to win. The defense will have to step it up if the Saints are going to make a significant playoff run.
Next 4 weeks: @CAR (1-3), @TB (3-1), IND (0-4), @STL (0-4)
What to expect: The next 2 on the road at their divisional rivals is going to be a challenge. Especially with Cam Newton and Josh Freeman doing good in their own right. Don't count the Colts or Rams for that matter. Nothing comes easy these days.
Atlanta 2-2 PF 90 PA 105 Div 0-1 Conf 2-2
Analysis: Don't let the numbers fool you, the Falcons are still a good team. Despite the -15 point differential, they are 11th in passing yards (260.5 ypg) and 10th in rush defense (97.3 ypc). They've hadn't produced a consistent winning yet. Maybe Falcons should face teams that have a bird in their logo, they are 2-0 against them right now.
Next 4 weeks: GB (4-0), CAR (1-3), @DET (4-0), BYE
What to expect: If things keep going the way they are, you can expect the Falcons to go 1-2. Again, the defense will need to step it up to have a chance to make this an undefeated 2nd quarter of the season.
Carolina 1-3 PF 89 PA 102 Div 0-0 Conf 0-3
Analysis: Despite the team record, Cam Newton looks like an early favorite for Offensive Rookie of the Year (97-163 1386 yards 5 touchdowns passing, 133 yards and 4 touchdowns rushing). But the Panthers are 31st in rushing defense (143.8 ypc). After a disappointing year last season, it might take some time for new coach Ron Rivera to turn them into winners this time around.
Next 4 weeks: NO (3-1), @ATL (2-2), WAS (3-1), MIN (0-4)
What to expect: This is basically a new team. It wouldn't be a surprise if the split these next 4 games, but don't count on it. As long as Newton doesn't hit that rookie wall, you can expect some more W's in their future.
NFC West
San Francisco 3-1 PF 94 PA 75 Div 1-0 Conf 3-1
Analysis: If you think it's a miracle that the 49ers are in 1st place, then you wouldn't be wrong. New coach Jim Harbaugh has gotten the best out of his talent. Even though the offense is 29th in passing yards (177.5) and 22nd in rushing yards (93.3), the defense has kept them in games. With the NFC West looking like they are going to be a weak division once again, the Niners look like they might be able to get away with that.
Next 4 weeks: TB (3-1), @DET (4-0), BYE, CLE (2-2)
What to expect: All that can be said is that there are going to be tough times ahead. But if they continue their play on defense and get their offensive numbers up... can someone say playoffs?
Seattle 1-3 PF 58 PA 97 Div 1-1 Conf 1-2
Analysis: If the Seahawks think they can go 7-9 and make it to the playoffs, think again. Pete Carroll and the Hawks will need the 12th Man at CenturyLink Field and a much improved offense (28th in passing (186.5 yds) and 31st in rushing (67.5 yds)) to make a second consecutive play appearance under Carroll.
Next 4 weeks: @NYG (3-1), BYE, @CLE (2-2), CIN (2-2)
What to expect: After their near comeback versus the Falcons last week, who really knows what Seahawk team is going to show up. Going up to Cleveland to face against old boss Mike Holmgren's team should be interesting.
Arizona 1-3 PF 86 PA 87 Div 0-1 Conf 1-3
Analysis: Looks like the Kevin Kolb trade is paying off. Yes, he thrown 4 interceptions, but his 80-130 1049 yards and 5 touchdowns have not hurt the Cardinals at all. 23 of those completions have gone to Larry Fitzgerald with 2 of them going for touchdowns. So why are the football Red Birds 2 games under .500? Being 26th in passing defense (282.2 yards) could be it.
Next 4 weeks: @MIN (0-4), BYE, PIT (2-2), @BAL (3-1)
What to expect: If the Vikings can figure out how to close out a game, the Cardinals could be 1-6. And that's factoring if the Steelers O-Line holds true and the Ravens stay consistent. Other than that, don't hold your breath Cardinal fans.
St. Louis 0-4 PF 46 PA 113 Div 0-0 Conf 0-3
Analysis: Looks like the Rams are going through a sophomore slump with Sam Bradford under center this season (2-2 last season). They finally had a decent outing against the Redskins losing by 7. But their first 3, they lost by an average of 20 points. Something's gotta give.
Next 4 weeks: BYE, @GB (4-0), @DAL (2-2), NO (3-1)
What to expect: If Bradford can get back to 100% and the anemic offense and defense can get their act together, expect some upsets. They have the talent and they have the depth, it's time for some winning to occur.
And you can follow both posts on Twitter. Follow @the_rtp_blog
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Monday, September 26, 2011
Hypathetical #2
I'd like to offer my apologies to UMass and South Alabama. I totally forgot to put them in my last post. Had I not got caught up in the excitement, I would've realized that there were two more members of the FBS. Plus I'm from Texas and all that was publicized were Texas State and UTSA.
To make it up to the Minutemen and Jaguar fans, I'll compose another super conference list that is absolutely ridiculous. And if anyone read my last post, just remember my wife is holding my manhood hostage because some crazy NCAA executive with a gun is power hungry and wants a monopoly. My imaginary wife is really hot and sweet and she wouldn't be doing this under any other circumstance. Then again this whole thing is my imagination, so here we go... AGAIN!!
()= Means current conference
ACC
Boston College
Buffalo (MAC)
Duke
Marshall (C-USA)
Maryland
Penn State (Big 10)
Pitt (Big East)
Rutgers (Big East)
Syracuse (Big East)
Temple (MAC)
UConn (Big East)
UMass (CAA)
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
West Virginia (Big East)
Explanation: Let's face it, the Big East is dead. The only two official schools leaving the Big East are Pitt and Syracuse. But why not take West Virginia and UConn just to make things more interesting. Add Marshall for a little West Virginia flavoring. Let's subtract NC State, North Carolina and Miami. And let's unite the Pennsylvania schools for a some more fun. We know that UMass will officially be joining the MAC next year. But as you'll see, I'm going to try to make the conferences more regional.
C-USA
Arkansas (SEC)
Illinois (Big 10)
Iowa (Big 10)
Iowa State (Big 12)
Kansas (Big 12)
Kansas State (Big 12)
Minnesota (Big 10)
Missouri (Big 12)
Nebraska (Big 10)
Northern Illinois (MAC)
Northwestern (Big 10)
Oklahoma (Big 12)
Oklahoma State (Big 12)
Purdue (Big 10)
Tulsa
Wisconsin (Big 10)
Explanation: It's just un-American to remove Conference USA. Shouldn't they have some teams to brag about?
MAC
Akron
Ball State
Bowling Green
Central Michigan
Cincinnati (Big East)
Eastern Michigan
Indiana (Big 10)
Kent State
Miami OH
Michigan (Big 10)
Michigan State (Big 10)
Notre Dame (Independent)
Ohio
Ohio State (Big 10)
Toledo
Western Michigan
Explanation: What's the point of calling them "Big" conferences anyway? Besides a MAC is not big, it's large. So let's just drop the gimmick already
Mt. West/WAC
Arizona (PAC 12)
Arizona State (PAC 12)
Boise State (MWC)
Colorado (PAC 12)
Colorado State (MWC)
Idaho (WAC)
Nevada (WAC)
New Mexico (MWC)
New Mexico State (WAC)
UNLV (MWC)
Utah (PAC 12)
Utah State (WAC)
UTEP (C-USA)
Wyoming (MWC)
Explanation: I just like the name MWAC and the fact that all the schools are in the same time zone is a huge bonus. Not that this conference has a shot in hell of being created.
PAC 12
California
Fresno State (WAC)
Hawaii (WAC)
Oregon
Oregon State
San Diego State (MWC)
San Jose State (WAC)
Stanford
UCLA
USC
Washington
Washington State
Explanation: Qualifications- Home State must touch the Pacific Ocean and have a minimum of 12 teams. Check and check.
SEC
Clemson (ACC)
ECU (C-USA)
Florida
Florida Atlantic (Sun Belt)
Florida International (Sun Belt)
Florida State (ACC)
Georgia
Georgia Tech (ACC)
Miami (ACC)
North Carolina (ACC)
North Carolina State (ACC)
South Carolina
UCF (C-USA)
USF (Big East)
Explanation: The SEC wants to go to 14 teams. Just tryin' to help.
SWC
Baylor (Big 12)
Houston (C-USA)
Louisiana Tech (WAC)
LSU (SEC)
North Texas (Sun Belt)
Rice (C-USA)
SMU (C-USA)
TCU (MWC)
Texas (Big 12)
Texas A&M (Big 12)
Texas State (FCS Independent)
Texas Tech (Big 12)
Tulane (C-USA)
ULL (Sun Belt)
ULM (Sun Belt)
UTSA (FCS Independent)
Explanation: A) The rivalry between Texas and Louisiana is pretty intense. B) After the Big XII mess, it kinda makes me miss the old Southwest Conference. But we all know that TCU is going to the Big East. A&M is heading to the SEC. Texas State and UTSA are members of the WAC next year. And everyone is staying put. Oh well.
Sun Belt
Alabama (SEC)
Arkansas State
Auburn (SEC)
Kentucky (SEC)
Louisville (Big East)
Memphis (C-USA)
Middle Tennessee
Mississippi State (SEC)
Ole Miss (SEC)
South Alabama (FCS Independent)
Southern Miss (C-USA)
Tennessee (SEC)
Troy
UAB (C-USA)
Vanderbilt (SEC)
Western Kentucky
Explanation: It took some doing, but I finally got a new FBS school in the right conference. But it would make sense if all the teams relocated by region.
FBS Independents
Air Force (MWC)
Army
BYU
Navy
Explanation: They fight our wars for us, should we drag these two into this petty conflict? I don't think so. They have better things to worry about than what bowl game they're going to. And just in case we have a Mormon that wins the presidency... let's just leave em alone. At any rate, God bless you all.
Relax sports fans, it's highly unlikely to happen. However, if it happens....well... DAMN I'M GOOD!!! I still don't seeing that coming to fruition anytime soon... thank God.
And you can follow both posts on Twitter. Follow @the_rtp_blog
To make it up to the Minutemen and Jaguar fans, I'll compose another super conference list that is absolutely ridiculous. And if anyone read my last post, just remember my wife is holding my manhood hostage because some crazy NCAA executive with a gun is power hungry and wants a monopoly. My imaginary wife is really hot and sweet and she wouldn't be doing this under any other circumstance. Then again this whole thing is my imagination, so here we go... AGAIN!!
()= Means current conference
ACC
Boston College
Buffalo (MAC)
Duke
Marshall (C-USA)
Maryland
Penn State (Big 10)
Pitt (Big East)
Rutgers (Big East)
Syracuse (Big East)
Temple (MAC)
UConn (Big East)
UMass (CAA)
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
West Virginia (Big East)
Explanation: Let's face it, the Big East is dead. The only two official schools leaving the Big East are Pitt and Syracuse. But why not take West Virginia and UConn just to make things more interesting. Add Marshall for a little West Virginia flavoring. Let's subtract NC State, North Carolina and Miami. And let's unite the Pennsylvania schools for a some more fun. We know that UMass will officially be joining the MAC next year. But as you'll see, I'm going to try to make the conferences more regional.
C-USA
Arkansas (SEC)
Illinois (Big 10)
Iowa (Big 10)
Iowa State (Big 12)
Kansas (Big 12)
Kansas State (Big 12)
Minnesota (Big 10)
Missouri (Big 12)
Nebraska (Big 10)
Northern Illinois (MAC)
Northwestern (Big 10)
Oklahoma (Big 12)
Oklahoma State (Big 12)
Purdue (Big 10)
Tulsa
Wisconsin (Big 10)
Explanation: It's just un-American to remove Conference USA. Shouldn't they have some teams to brag about?
MAC
Akron
Ball State
Bowling Green
Central Michigan
Cincinnati (Big East)
Eastern Michigan
Indiana (Big 10)
Kent State
Miami OH
Michigan (Big 10)
Michigan State (Big 10)
Notre Dame (Independent)
Ohio
Ohio State (Big 10)
Toledo
Western Michigan
Explanation: What's the point of calling them "Big" conferences anyway? Besides a MAC is not big, it's large. So let's just drop the gimmick already
Mt. West/WAC
Arizona (PAC 12)
Arizona State (PAC 12)
Boise State (MWC)
Colorado (PAC 12)
Colorado State (MWC)
Idaho (WAC)
Nevada (WAC)
New Mexico (MWC)
New Mexico State (WAC)
UNLV (MWC)
Utah (PAC 12)
Utah State (WAC)
UTEP (C-USA)
Wyoming (MWC)
Explanation: I just like the name MWAC and the fact that all the schools are in the same time zone is a huge bonus. Not that this conference has a shot in hell of being created.
PAC 12
California
Fresno State (WAC)
Hawaii (WAC)
Oregon
Oregon State
San Diego State (MWC)
San Jose State (WAC)
Stanford
UCLA
USC
Washington
Washington State
Explanation: Qualifications- Home State must touch the Pacific Ocean and have a minimum of 12 teams. Check and check.
SEC
Clemson (ACC)
ECU (C-USA)
Florida
Florida Atlantic (Sun Belt)
Florida International (Sun Belt)
Florida State (ACC)
Georgia
Georgia Tech (ACC)
Miami (ACC)
North Carolina (ACC)
North Carolina State (ACC)
South Carolina
UCF (C-USA)
USF (Big East)
Explanation: The SEC wants to go to 14 teams. Just tryin' to help.
SWC
Baylor (Big 12)
Houston (C-USA)
Louisiana Tech (WAC)
LSU (SEC)
North Texas (Sun Belt)
Rice (C-USA)
SMU (C-USA)
TCU (MWC)
Texas (Big 12)
Texas A&M (Big 12)
Texas State (FCS Independent)
Texas Tech (Big 12)
Tulane (C-USA)
ULL (Sun Belt)
ULM (Sun Belt)
UTSA (FCS Independent)
Explanation: A) The rivalry between Texas and Louisiana is pretty intense. B) After the Big XII mess, it kinda makes me miss the old Southwest Conference. But we all know that TCU is going to the Big East. A&M is heading to the SEC. Texas State and UTSA are members of the WAC next year. And everyone is staying put. Oh well.
Sun Belt
Alabama (SEC)
Arkansas State
Auburn (SEC)
Kentucky (SEC)
Louisville (Big East)
Memphis (C-USA)
Middle Tennessee
Mississippi State (SEC)
Ole Miss (SEC)
South Alabama (FCS Independent)
Southern Miss (C-USA)
Tennessee (SEC)
Troy
UAB (C-USA)
Vanderbilt (SEC)
Western Kentucky
Explanation: It took some doing, but I finally got a new FBS school in the right conference. But it would make sense if all the teams relocated by region.
FBS Independents
Air Force (MWC)
Army
BYU
Navy
Explanation: They fight our wars for us, should we drag these two into this petty conflict? I don't think so. They have better things to worry about than what bowl game they're going to. And just in case we have a Mormon that wins the presidency... let's just leave em alone. At any rate, God bless you all.
Relax sports fans, it's highly unlikely to happen. However, if it happens....well... DAMN I'M GOOD!!! I still don't seeing that coming to fruition anytime soon... thank God.
And you can follow both posts on Twitter. Follow @the_rtp_blog
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
NCAA Football 2012 in the Hypathetical
Yes folks, the pun is intended. It really is sad that the FBS is going in this direction, but who can do anything about it? If I were up to me, there might be some small changes, but these mega conferences would not happen. One of those changes would be to eliminate the term AQ conference. And the only way I would ever go with this idea would be if someone from the NCAA held my wife at gunpoint and told her to chop my balls off if I didn't comply. So put that evil blade down and get that gun away from her and I'll play along. So here we go.
Currently, there are 120 schools that play in the FBS. Six conferences(the ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, PAC 12 and SEC) automatically qualify for a BCS bid. This means that Conference USA, the MAC, Mountain West, Sun Belt and WAC have to pull a miracle to get a shot for a national title. And let's not forget Notre Dame, Navy, Army and BYU are on their own this season.
Next season, there will be two new teams (Texas State and UTSA) that will be joining the FBS and the fact that many conferences will be realigning like crazy, it looks like drastic changes will be happening. Here's how the conferences would shape up next year... in a sad, pathetic way.
ACC
Boston College
Clemson
Duke
Florida State
Georgia Tech
Maryland
Miami (FL)
North Carolina
North Carolina State
Pittsburgh
Syracuse
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Explanation: Pitt and Syracuse are officially joining according to the events over this weekend. Of course they could add UConn and Rutgers later on, but who knows?
Big East/Big 12
Baylor
Cincinnati
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Louisville
Missouri
Notre Dame
Rutgers
Temple
UConn
USF
Explanation: The Big 12 will probably keep its namesake in this move. Notre Dame will be forced to join in as they are members of the Big East in everything else. West Virginia will most likely be the 14th team for the SEC. And if this new conference is wanting to tap into the Philly market, Temple would be a good start. Assuming Villanova decides to no to join in of course. Since the MAC is not a great source of exposure for them in football, plus Temple is not in the middle of America. TCU might come (Big East 2012), but that's too early to tell with the way everything is going.
Big 10
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Nebraska
Northwestern
Ohio State
Penn State
Purdue
Wisconsin
Explanation: Looks like they're happy... for the moment.
C-USA
East Carolina
Houston
Marshall
Memphis
Rice
SMU
Southern Miss
Tulane
Tulsa
UAB
USF
UTEP
Explanation: In a world where everything is changing around them, Conference USA stays the same. And maybe when Hell freezes over, they could be an BCS automatic berth conference.
MAC
Akron
Ball State
Bowling Green
Buffalo
Central Michigan
Eastern Michigan
Kent State
Miami (OH)
Northern Illinois
Ohio
Toledo
Western Michigan
Explanation: Maybe I'm OCD or something, but having 12 teams makes sense. Or I just like things in even numbers. I'm still trying to figure why the hell I would say Temple is not considered Mid-American and Buffalo is. Go figure.
Mt. West/WAC
Air Force
Boise State
BYU
Colorado State
Fresno State
Hawaii
Idaho
Nevada
New Mexico
New Mexico State
San Diego State
San Jose State
TCU
UNLV
Utah State
Wyoming
Explanation: This conference is as farfetched as "________". In all likelihood, this just ain't happening. But for fun, BYU's independent run is a one year deal. TCU stays put and part of the condition for them staying is to let Louisiana Tech go. As far as Texas State and UTSA is concerned, there is no WAC to join. It could be called the Mountain Western Athletic Conference or MWAC for short. If this actually happens, then imagination land is real.
PAC 16
Arizona
Arizona State
California
Colorado
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
Oregon
Oregon State
Stanford
Texas
Texas Tech
UCLA
USC
Utah
Washington
Washington State
Explanation: Just something I heard on the news. Will this actually happen?
SEC
Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Mississippi State
Ole Miss
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas A&M
Vanderbilt
West Virginia
Explanation: It's just a rumor. This would be an interesting concept to see how this all works out for these two schools.
Sun Belt
Arkansas State
FAU
FIU
Louisiana Tech
Middle Tennessee
North Texas
Texas State
Troy
ULL
ULM
UTSA
Western Kentucky
Explanation: I know it looks like another OCD fantasy, but it does make sense geographically.
FBS Independents
Army
Navy
Explanation: They fight our wars for us, should we drag these two into this petty conflict? I don't think so. They have better things to worry about than what bowl game they're going to. God bless you all.
And you can follow both posts on Twitter. Follow @the_rtp_blog
There you have it. With everything going the way it is, who really knows why this happening. Some of this is rumored while others have been confirmed to be occurring next school year. But it's all fantasy until it really happens.
Currently, there are 120 schools that play in the FBS. Six conferences(the ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, PAC 12 and SEC) automatically qualify for a BCS bid. This means that Conference USA, the MAC, Mountain West, Sun Belt and WAC have to pull a miracle to get a shot for a national title. And let's not forget Notre Dame, Navy, Army and BYU are on their own this season.
Next season, there will be two new teams (Texas State and UTSA) that will be joining the FBS and the fact that many conferences will be realigning like crazy, it looks like drastic changes will be happening. Here's how the conferences would shape up next year... in a sad, pathetic way.
ACC
Boston College
Clemson
Duke
Florida State
Georgia Tech
Maryland
Miami (FL)
North Carolina
North Carolina State
Pittsburgh
Syracuse
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Explanation: Pitt and Syracuse are officially joining according to the events over this weekend. Of course they could add UConn and Rutgers later on, but who knows?
Big East/Big 12
Baylor
Cincinnati
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Louisville
Missouri
Notre Dame
Rutgers
Temple
UConn
USF
Explanation: The Big 12 will probably keep its namesake in this move. Notre Dame will be forced to join in as they are members of the Big East in everything else. West Virginia will most likely be the 14th team for the SEC. And if this new conference is wanting to tap into the Philly market, Temple would be a good start. Assuming Villanova decides to no to join in of course. Since the MAC is not a great source of exposure for them in football, plus Temple is not in the middle of America. TCU might come (Big East 2012), but that's too early to tell with the way everything is going.
Big 10
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Nebraska
Northwestern
Ohio State
Penn State
Purdue
Wisconsin
Explanation: Looks like they're happy... for the moment.
C-USA
East Carolina
Houston
Marshall
Memphis
Rice
SMU
Southern Miss
Tulane
Tulsa
UAB
USF
UTEP
Explanation: In a world where everything is changing around them, Conference USA stays the same. And maybe when Hell freezes over, they could be an BCS automatic berth conference.
MAC
Akron
Ball State
Bowling Green
Buffalo
Central Michigan
Eastern Michigan
Kent State
Miami (OH)
Northern Illinois
Ohio
Toledo
Western Michigan
Explanation: Maybe I'm OCD or something, but having 12 teams makes sense. Or I just like things in even numbers. I'm still trying to figure why the hell I would say Temple is not considered Mid-American and Buffalo is. Go figure.
Mt. West/WAC
Air Force
Boise State
BYU
Colorado State
Fresno State
Hawaii
Idaho
Nevada
New Mexico
New Mexico State
San Diego State
San Jose State
TCU
UNLV
Utah State
Wyoming
Explanation: This conference is as farfetched as "________". In all likelihood, this just ain't happening. But for fun, BYU's independent run is a one year deal. TCU stays put and part of the condition for them staying is to let Louisiana Tech go. As far as Texas State and UTSA is concerned, there is no WAC to join. It could be called the Mountain Western Athletic Conference or MWAC for short. If this actually happens, then imagination land is real.
PAC 16
Arizona
Arizona State
California
Colorado
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
Oregon
Oregon State
Stanford
Texas
Texas Tech
UCLA
USC
Utah
Washington
Washington State
Explanation: Just something I heard on the news. Will this actually happen?
SEC
Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Mississippi State
Ole Miss
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas A&M
Vanderbilt
West Virginia
Explanation: It's just a rumor. This would be an interesting concept to see how this all works out for these two schools.
Sun Belt
Arkansas State
FAU
FIU
Louisiana Tech
Middle Tennessee
North Texas
Texas State
Troy
ULL
ULM
UTSA
Western Kentucky
Explanation: I know it looks like another OCD fantasy, but it does make sense geographically.
FBS Independents
Army
Navy
Explanation: They fight our wars for us, should we drag these two into this petty conflict? I don't think so. They have better things to worry about than what bowl game they're going to. God bless you all.
And you can follow both posts on Twitter. Follow @the_rtp_blog
There you have it. With everything going the way it is, who really knows why this happening. Some of this is rumored while others have been confirmed to be occurring next school year. But it's all fantasy until it really happens.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Texas: The New East Coast State
I know it's been a couple of months have passed since I last wrote. During that stretch, I've had nothing to say...REALLY!!! That is until now.
I could've said something about the NBA strike. But I've already had my say (sort of). Besides it's like beating a dead horse with a stick so often that PETA would be raising hell. Speaking of PETA, how about writing about Michael Vick. First of all, he did the crime and served his time... move on already!!! Second, Vick has not made the same mistakes since being released from prison 2 years ago. And third, yes I read the article about if Vick would've been white. I'll wait 'til the Super Bowl before I make some comment. At any rate, it's all old news that needs to quit being recycled.
But there has been something happening in Texas that is disturbing. Not one, but two Texas FBS schools are going to east coast conferences. That's right folks, we have TCU going to the Big East and Texas A&M on their way to the SEC (assuming the schools don't pursue litigation). It's really ironic that these two used to be members of the former Southwest Conference. Given the circumstances, it's really not a shock at all. In essence, TCU wants to be a school that automatically qualifies for a BCS bowl. The Aggies are not big fans of the Longhorn Network. Again, not a surprise at all. It's just flat out weird.
Growing up in Texas meant that you were tougher than someone from the east or west coast. Anyone can argue toughness, but I'm from Texas and believe me when I say this... it just is something that is burned in your memory. Not anymore people.
When TCU played in the Rose Bowl earlier this year, it was apparent that the BCS is rigged...AGAIN!!! Yes there were two other undefeated teams in Oregon and Auburn, but they played AQ conferences and go to play for the national championship. TCU is in the Mountain West and they are not an AQ conference. I'll get to that at a later time to say why the Horned Frogs were screwed out of a title. So going to the Big East next school year makes since to a degree.
The Big 12 had already lost 2 schools. Colorado went to the PAC-12, while Nebraska went to the Big Ten. Both of these moves made sense because of the geography. For Texas A&M, moving to the SEC makes no sense in terms of regional logistics. But if you were in their shoes, could you blame them for wanting to leave. Why??
For the last several months, ESPN has been pushing the Longhorn Network. And if you guessed that only the University of Texas benefits from this deal, you would be right. This would make one to believe that there would be a mass exodus from the Big 12. But only A&M has shown any passion about leaving. And if you don't know the rivalry between the Horns and Aggies, then you must be living under a rock or something. We'll have to see if the Big 12 can be salvaged or not in the coming weeks.
Having one Texas school going to an east coast conference is one thing. But two? This is too damn weird for me. I might need a Lone Star beer to give me a true feeling of the Texas I used to know. Hell, I might need a keg or two to get over this.
I could've said something about the NBA strike. But I've already had my say (sort of). Besides it's like beating a dead horse with a stick so often that PETA would be raising hell. Speaking of PETA, how about writing about Michael Vick. First of all, he did the crime and served his time... move on already!!! Second, Vick has not made the same mistakes since being released from prison 2 years ago. And third, yes I read the article about if Vick would've been white. I'll wait 'til the Super Bowl before I make some comment. At any rate, it's all old news that needs to quit being recycled.
But there has been something happening in Texas that is disturbing. Not one, but two Texas FBS schools are going to east coast conferences. That's right folks, we have TCU going to the Big East and Texas A&M on their way to the SEC (assuming the schools don't pursue litigation). It's really ironic that these two used to be members of the former Southwest Conference. Given the circumstances, it's really not a shock at all. In essence, TCU wants to be a school that automatically qualifies for a BCS bowl. The Aggies are not big fans of the Longhorn Network. Again, not a surprise at all. It's just flat out weird.
Growing up in Texas meant that you were tougher than someone from the east or west coast. Anyone can argue toughness, but I'm from Texas and believe me when I say this... it just is something that is burned in your memory. Not anymore people.
When TCU played in the Rose Bowl earlier this year, it was apparent that the BCS is rigged...AGAIN!!! Yes there were two other undefeated teams in Oregon and Auburn, but they played AQ conferences and go to play for the national championship. TCU is in the Mountain West and they are not an AQ conference. I'll get to that at a later time to say why the Horned Frogs were screwed out of a title. So going to the Big East next school year makes since to a degree.
The Big 12 had already lost 2 schools. Colorado went to the PAC-12, while Nebraska went to the Big Ten. Both of these moves made sense because of the geography. For Texas A&M, moving to the SEC makes no sense in terms of regional logistics. But if you were in their shoes, could you blame them for wanting to leave. Why??
For the last several months, ESPN has been pushing the Longhorn Network. And if you guessed that only the University of Texas benefits from this deal, you would be right. This would make one to believe that there would be a mass exodus from the Big 12. But only A&M has shown any passion about leaving. And if you don't know the rivalry between the Horns and Aggies, then you must be living under a rock or something. We'll have to see if the Big 12 can be salvaged or not in the coming weeks.
Having one Texas school going to an east coast conference is one thing. But two? This is too damn weird for me. I might need a Lone Star beer to give me a true feeling of the Texas I used to know. Hell, I might need a keg or two to get over this.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Surprise me if you can
On a scale from 1(hardly shocked) to 10 (caught me off guard), where do these past, current or future events rank.
The Atlanta Thrashers becoming the new Winnipeg Jets?
3. Low attendance, ownership not putting a total effort in marketing the team. Can't say I'm shocked. But to lose a second hockey team to Canada (the Flames left for Calgary in 1980), that is a bit surprising.
Mark Cuban actually owning an MLB team?
10. If I were a player, I would want to be working for this guy. If I were a commissioner, you would need this guy. Why? Cuban reminds me a little bit of Jack Bauer of 24, the bosses might not like his tactics, but he gets positive results. With all those years with George Steinbrenner, how could you go wrong with Cuban? If you look at his track record with what the Dallas Mavericks before and after he purchased them, you wouldn't bat an eyelash. I am so tired of this McCourt divorce drama already, let him buy the Dodgers. Things would be interesting in more ways than anyone can imagine.
Tiger Woods getting a tournament win this year?
1. It's not the divorce that's been affecting his game, it's the injuries. Like most sports, the lower body is very important. And with Tiger's injuries to his knees and Achilles tendon, his game will suffer until he gets himself healthy. All of the discretions that have mired his personal life shouldn't be the issue anymore. But there's always a chance that it could still be the other half of his struggles. Regardless, I wouldn't be surprised if he came back better than ever.
Charlie Sheen admitting to using steroids for his role as Ricky "Wild Thing" Vaughn in Major League?
0. Given Sheen's drug history, is there really any shock value to that? The only way this could've been a 10 was if Bob Uecker admitted to HGH use for his role as Harry Doyle.
Qatar hosting the World Cup in 2022?
4. Usually host nations are bigger in terms of land mass. Looking at Qatar, it's really not that big of a shock that they are hosting. They do have quite a bit of economic resources that makes them desirable in every way, shape and form. Give it 11 years and it won't be a surprise as to why they were selected.
Novak Djokovic as the Wimbledon champion?
5. He's had an impressive win streak to start this year. And from what I saw in his last few tournaments, Nole isn't the same guy he used to be. It was more of a surprise to see Rafa Nadal look like he was a step behind.
The Houston Astros being rumored to move to the AL West?
7. The Stros have been a staple in the NL for close to 50 years now. It doesn't make sense demographically anyway. MLB could move the Diamondbacks or the Rockies to the AL and move the Astros to the NL West. Why Colorado or Arizona? A) Having a Texas team in both leagues in the western market would be bring greater revenue. B) An Astros-Rangers World Series will generate lots more interest in the state. There were the Yankees-Giants, A's-Giants, Yankees-Mets and Angels-Giants, so why not the only two MLB teams in the Lone Star State? C) Having the D-Backs win another title as an AL team would be a positive historic occurrence that is so needed. D) The Rockies should've been in the other league when expansion occurred in 1993. E) Both Colorado (1993) and Arizona (1998) haven't been there as long as the Astros (1962). Don't mess with tradition.
NBA players preparing to jump overseas as a contingency?
1. Let's review shall we. The lockout has been going on since June 30th. Both sides are still far apart with no timetable as to when a resolution will develop. Billy Hunter encouraging players to do what they have to do. But there are bigger issues to worry about than what players are going to do if there is no season in the NBA. If Clark Gable were still alive he would say, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn". My sentiments exactly.
The Atlanta Thrashers becoming the new Winnipeg Jets?
3. Low attendance, ownership not putting a total effort in marketing the team. Can't say I'm shocked. But to lose a second hockey team to Canada (the Flames left for Calgary in 1980), that is a bit surprising.
Mark Cuban actually owning an MLB team?
10. If I were a player, I would want to be working for this guy. If I were a commissioner, you would need this guy. Why? Cuban reminds me a little bit of Jack Bauer of 24, the bosses might not like his tactics, but he gets positive results. With all those years with George Steinbrenner, how could you go wrong with Cuban? If you look at his track record with what the Dallas Mavericks before and after he purchased them, you wouldn't bat an eyelash. I am so tired of this McCourt divorce drama already, let him buy the Dodgers. Things would be interesting in more ways than anyone can imagine.
Tiger Woods getting a tournament win this year?
1. It's not the divorce that's been affecting his game, it's the injuries. Like most sports, the lower body is very important. And with Tiger's injuries to his knees and Achilles tendon, his game will suffer until he gets himself healthy. All of the discretions that have mired his personal life shouldn't be the issue anymore. But there's always a chance that it could still be the other half of his struggles. Regardless, I wouldn't be surprised if he came back better than ever.
Charlie Sheen admitting to using steroids for his role as Ricky "Wild Thing" Vaughn in Major League?
0. Given Sheen's drug history, is there really any shock value to that? The only way this could've been a 10 was if Bob Uecker admitted to HGH use for his role as Harry Doyle.
Qatar hosting the World Cup in 2022?
4. Usually host nations are bigger in terms of land mass. Looking at Qatar, it's really not that big of a shock that they are hosting. They do have quite a bit of economic resources that makes them desirable in every way, shape and form. Give it 11 years and it won't be a surprise as to why they were selected.
Novak Djokovic as the Wimbledon champion?
5. He's had an impressive win streak to start this year. And from what I saw in his last few tournaments, Nole isn't the same guy he used to be. It was more of a surprise to see Rafa Nadal look like he was a step behind.
The Houston Astros being rumored to move to the AL West?
7. The Stros have been a staple in the NL for close to 50 years now. It doesn't make sense demographically anyway. MLB could move the Diamondbacks or the Rockies to the AL and move the Astros to the NL West. Why Colorado or Arizona? A) Having a Texas team in both leagues in the western market would be bring greater revenue. B) An Astros-Rangers World Series will generate lots more interest in the state. There were the Yankees-Giants, A's-Giants, Yankees-Mets and Angels-Giants, so why not the only two MLB teams in the Lone Star State? C) Having the D-Backs win another title as an AL team would be a positive historic occurrence that is so needed. D) The Rockies should've been in the other league when expansion occurred in 1993. E) Both Colorado (1993) and Arizona (1998) haven't been there as long as the Astros (1962). Don't mess with tradition.
NBA players preparing to jump overseas as a contingency?
1. Let's review shall we. The lockout has been going on since June 30th. Both sides are still far apart with no timetable as to when a resolution will develop. Billy Hunter encouraging players to do what they have to do. But there are bigger issues to worry about than what players are going to do if there is no season in the NBA. If Clark Gable were still alive he would say, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn". My sentiments exactly.
Friday, July 8, 2011
Big Zeke and the Curious Case of the NBA Strike
Sometime in the future, the NBA will resume operations. Whether that time comes very soon or much later is another matter. The only thing that anyone can do in the mean time is speculate. So while we wait, there are some things can do. We could watch some baseball. Or maybe watch the women's soccer team go for the gold. But if you're looking for just basketball, there's always the WNBA heaven forbid. Those things and many others will have to do until the lockout gets figured out.
The lockout for all we know has many details. One of those issues that I want to touch on is the salary cap. We all know that there are some owners who want a hard cap, while others still feel that the cap should remain the way it is. As usual, there are teams who are making claims that they are losing money. Until there is proof of such, we'll just have to see how this all plays out.
For the 30 franchises in the 28 media markets, they better hope that no regular season games are missed or there will be hell to pay. The last thing that the owners need is a loss of revenue. Just ask the MLB and NHL executives how long it took to recover. Or maybe the investors should learn from the last players strike that happened over a decade ago.
All anyone knows is that every labor strike in the history of America has been about the division of assets. The real question is what percentage is considered a fair deal. As times change, so does the value of the employee. That's always been and always will be the issue.
That goes for anyone running a team. To win championships on a consistent basis, you need to have these 3 things; players who can coexist, coaches and personnel who can devise a strategy that fits the players abilities, and of course owners who pay a fair value. In due time, your favorite team will be a dynasty. So let me ask you this, "What is the true value of a player?" Yes, that is the question we must all answer.
Disclaimer: If you're a Knicks fan, you probably don't want to read the next several paragraphs. Either you don't want to be reminded of the last decade again or you already know all the stats that it would be redundant. But since you've come this far, you might as well read on. Just don't feel obliged.
You have to ask yourself, how could you do any worst than Scott Layden? He was the executive who helped build the Jazz into a postseason threat during his time there. At least the guy could prove that he could make the right moves. Sadly, it never worked out for him in NYC. But to answer the question, you could do worst by hiring Isiah Thomas.
As any casual sports fan can tell you, Thomas is one of the best point guards in NBA history. His success from winning a national championship for the Indiana Hoosiers was no fluke. In his 13 seasons with the Pistons, he made 3 NBA Finals appearances and brought the Motor City's first two titles in professional basketball. For that, he became a 1st ballot hall of famer in 2000. However, success as a player doesn't translate as an executive. Or even as a coach.
After Thomas retired as a player in 1994, he would become the first executive vice president for the expansion Toronto Raptors. When the Raptors began play in 1995 until he left on November 22, 1997, they were 52-123 (.292). He did draft the team's 1st ever Rookie of the Year in Damon Stoudamire along with Marcus Camby and Tracy McGrady.
And then came the ownership of the Continental Basketball Association from 1998-2000. The league went into bankruptcy which would lead Thomas to his next stop, Indianapolis. When Larry Bird left, Zeke took the coaching reigns. While Bird coached the Pacers to their first and only NBA Finals (2000), Thomas pretty much kept the ball going. Despite 3 underperforming playoff appearances, the Pacers would be 131-115 (.533) under Thomas. All of those instances would lead to James Dolan and his decision.
On December 22, 2003, the 10-18 New York Knicks would hire Thomas to be their president of basketball operations. Sure it all started well when they finished the season 29-25 and made the playoffs. But as history will tell you, it didn't end well. They had two coaching legends in Lenny Wilkens and Larry Brown, and still couldn't produce results. In 2006, Dolan issued an ultimatum, show improvement or kiss your job goodbye. While Thomas helped improve the team's win total by 10 games, the next season they dropped back to Brown's win total in his only season (23). In April of 2008, Thomas was not retained and he would no longer be a physical presence in the front office or the sidelines.
But Thomas' impact on the team would linger for some time. Sometimes it looked like he made some great acquisitions with Vin Baker, Jalen Rose, Steve Francis, Maurice Taylor , Penny Hardaway just to name a few, these guys were in the twilight of their careers and would be trade pieces or ended up being released. Besides some of them didn't last more than 2 1/2 seasons, but still a major impact on the Knicks' salary cap. What I am focusing on are the 4 players who he brought on that ironically put the NBA in its present state today.
January 5, 2004 the Knicks worked a trade to deliver Coney Island legend Stephon Marbury from the Suns for Antonio McDyess and some other players. Marbury played 536 games (missing only 6 starts) averaging 20.5 points, 8.2 assists, 3.2 turnovers and 1.3 steals a game for the Timberwolves, Nets and Suns. Which prompted Suns management before the beginning 2003-04 season to sign Marbury to a 4 year $76.8 million extension. All signs looked great as the Knicks showed improvement.
Here's the thing that Thomas didn't take into consideration. There was a reason why Marbury was getting traded every 2 or 3 years. He wanted to be the star. Nothing wrong with that attitude, but when you have trust issues, that's when problems happen. The season after Marbury was traded from Minnesota, the Wolves went 50-32 (.610) compared to the 89-78 (.533) during his 2+ seasons he was there. Let's not forget his time in East Rutherford. Despite having his best season in 2000-01 where he averaged 23.9 points, 7.6 assists and 3.2 rebounds a game, the Nets never won more than 31 games. After he was swapped to the Suns for Jason Kidd, the Nets made it to the finals in back to back seasons. His stay in Phoenix was kind of the same except they did make the playoffs in what would be his final full season for them in 2002-03.
But his longing for the Knicks along with the Suns losing made Marbury a pest to management. Zeke eyeing an opportunity to bring a big name to the team, acquired the disgruntled player. Again the Suns improved and the team with Marbury suffered. During the longest stint of his career with one team, Marbury averaged 18.2 points, 7 assists, 2.7 turnovers and 1.2 steals in 287 games. Thomas must've thought that Marbury's homecoming season where he finished with 19.8 points per game and had a 3:1 turnover would be a good sign. However, this was a sign that the worst was coming for both these guys.
Let's start with August 2, 2005, one of the worst days to be a New York Knick. Jerome James had a career year in the 2005 playoffs averaging 12.5 points, 6.8 rebounds and 1.8 blocks in 11 games. Despite posting a 5.1 point, 2.1 rebound and 1.3 block average in 252 games for Seattle, James helped get himself a lucrative deal. And thanks to Zeke, he got his payday with a 5 year $29 million deal. James would average 3.1 points and 2.1 rebounds in his first season.
Sadly, he was not any more productive. James' averaged 2.5 points, 1.8 rebounds and 0.6 blocks during his 89 games. What's sad is that when Thomas became the coach, he was a benchwarmer and with Mike D'Antoni, he was nowhere to be found.
The sign and trade of Eddy Curry later on would be an insurance policy. Curry was part of the baby Bulls era where he and Tyson Chandler were going to be the next Twin Towers of the NBA. Curry turned out to be an underachiever throughout his time in Chicago. He averaged 11.8 points, 0.9 blocks and 4.9 rebounds in 289 games. While it looked like Curry was making a turnaround in 2004-05 season averaging 16.1 points and 5.4 rebounds a game, something bad happened. It turned out that he had heart issues. The Bulls wanted him to get a DNA test to see if his condition was congenital, but Curry refused. Did that stop Thomas...NOOOO!!!
Curry who felt like he was going to get screwed by management decided to give the Knicks a chance. So they arranged an sign and trade deal worth $56 million over 6 years and was dealt on October 24th. While he looked like he was improved at times, he was still as inconsistent as was with the Bulls. In 2006-07, Curry started and played in all but one game and averaged 19.5 points and 7 rebounds. For the 222 games he played for New York, he averaged 15.2 points and 5.8 rebounds. But he saw a decline in playing time and proved he was still a defensive liability.
Jared Jeffries just like Thomas was an Indiana Hoosier. And just like Zeke he played in the national championship. So when the Wizards selected Jeffries as the 11th overall pick in 2002, they had hopes that he was going to be something special. He just turned out to be a decent player that was injury prone. In the 2004-05 season, Jeffries averaged 6.8 points and 2.9 rebounds in 77 games. But it was the following season that caught Thomas's eye. He played in the same number of games but started 6 more games. His numbers did take a slight dip, but it was in the playoffs that Jeffries began to shine. In the 2006 playoffs he averaged 8 points and 6.2 rebounds in 6 games.
So that prompted Zeke to sign Jeffries for 5 years $30 million. While he was a restricted free agent, the Wizards decided to let the Knicks have him. Unfortunately, the story was the same for Jeffries. He had a hard time staying healthy, but when he was, he worked hard. In 2008-09 he averaged 8.1 points and pulled down 6.3 rebounds in 56 games.
Hopefully I made my point about the owners being liable for this strike happening. People will say if the players weren't so greedy about taking these huge contracts, then this would not be happening. But do you expect the players NOT to pass up that kind of opportunity? If you do, then you must be having the best time in Imaginationland. A lot of people would love to get a multi-million dollar contract to be unproductive. But make sure you work hard and maybe you'll be the lucky one.
Like I said before, to be a dynasty, everyone on the team needs to be on the same page. On top of that, owners need to quit giving loads of money to talent that won't give their teams a prosperous return in their investment. It's always a crapshoot finding talent that will make the team better, but COME ON!!! You people have the money, find some personnel that knows how to recruit talent and hire them. And also, don't be afraid to pay your players their fair market value.
The lockout for all we know has many details. One of those issues that I want to touch on is the salary cap. We all know that there are some owners who want a hard cap, while others still feel that the cap should remain the way it is. As usual, there are teams who are making claims that they are losing money. Until there is proof of such, we'll just have to see how this all plays out.
For the 30 franchises in the 28 media markets, they better hope that no regular season games are missed or there will be hell to pay. The last thing that the owners need is a loss of revenue. Just ask the MLB and NHL executives how long it took to recover. Or maybe the investors should learn from the last players strike that happened over a decade ago.
All anyone knows is that every labor strike in the history of America has been about the division of assets. The real question is what percentage is considered a fair deal. As times change, so does the value of the employee. That's always been and always will be the issue.
That goes for anyone running a team. To win championships on a consistent basis, you need to have these 3 things; players who can coexist, coaches and personnel who can devise a strategy that fits the players abilities, and of course owners who pay a fair value. In due time, your favorite team will be a dynasty. So let me ask you this, "What is the true value of a player?" Yes, that is the question we must all answer.
Disclaimer: If you're a Knicks fan, you probably don't want to read the next several paragraphs. Either you don't want to be reminded of the last decade again or you already know all the stats that it would be redundant. But since you've come this far, you might as well read on. Just don't feel obliged.
You have to ask yourself, how could you do any worst than Scott Layden? He was the executive who helped build the Jazz into a postseason threat during his time there. At least the guy could prove that he could make the right moves. Sadly, it never worked out for him in NYC. But to answer the question, you could do worst by hiring Isiah Thomas.
As any casual sports fan can tell you, Thomas is one of the best point guards in NBA history. His success from winning a national championship for the Indiana Hoosiers was no fluke. In his 13 seasons with the Pistons, he made 3 NBA Finals appearances and brought the Motor City's first two titles in professional basketball. For that, he became a 1st ballot hall of famer in 2000. However, success as a player doesn't translate as an executive. Or even as a coach.
After Thomas retired as a player in 1994, he would become the first executive vice president for the expansion Toronto Raptors. When the Raptors began play in 1995 until he left on November 22, 1997, they were 52-123 (.292). He did draft the team's 1st ever Rookie of the Year in Damon Stoudamire along with Marcus Camby and Tracy McGrady.
And then came the ownership of the Continental Basketball Association from 1998-2000. The league went into bankruptcy which would lead Thomas to his next stop, Indianapolis. When Larry Bird left, Zeke took the coaching reigns. While Bird coached the Pacers to their first and only NBA Finals (2000), Thomas pretty much kept the ball going. Despite 3 underperforming playoff appearances, the Pacers would be 131-115 (.533) under Thomas. All of those instances would lead to James Dolan and his decision.
On December 22, 2003, the 10-18 New York Knicks would hire Thomas to be their president of basketball operations. Sure it all started well when they finished the season 29-25 and made the playoffs. But as history will tell you, it didn't end well. They had two coaching legends in Lenny Wilkens and Larry Brown, and still couldn't produce results. In 2006, Dolan issued an ultimatum, show improvement or kiss your job goodbye. While Thomas helped improve the team's win total by 10 games, the next season they dropped back to Brown's win total in his only season (23). In April of 2008, Thomas was not retained and he would no longer be a physical presence in the front office or the sidelines.
But Thomas' impact on the team would linger for some time. Sometimes it looked like he made some great acquisitions with Vin Baker, Jalen Rose, Steve Francis, Maurice Taylor , Penny Hardaway just to name a few, these guys were in the twilight of their careers and would be trade pieces or ended up being released. Besides some of them didn't last more than 2 1/2 seasons, but still a major impact on the Knicks' salary cap. What I am focusing on are the 4 players who he brought on that ironically put the NBA in its present state today.
January 5, 2004 the Knicks worked a trade to deliver Coney Island legend Stephon Marbury from the Suns for Antonio McDyess and some other players. Marbury played 536 games (missing only 6 starts) averaging 20.5 points, 8.2 assists, 3.2 turnovers and 1.3 steals a game for the Timberwolves, Nets and Suns. Which prompted Suns management before the beginning 2003-04 season to sign Marbury to a 4 year $76.8 million extension. All signs looked great as the Knicks showed improvement.
Here's the thing that Thomas didn't take into consideration. There was a reason why Marbury was getting traded every 2 or 3 years. He wanted to be the star. Nothing wrong with that attitude, but when you have trust issues, that's when problems happen. The season after Marbury was traded from Minnesota, the Wolves went 50-32 (.610) compared to the 89-78 (.533) during his 2+ seasons he was there. Let's not forget his time in East Rutherford. Despite having his best season in 2000-01 where he averaged 23.9 points, 7.6 assists and 3.2 rebounds a game, the Nets never won more than 31 games. After he was swapped to the Suns for Jason Kidd, the Nets made it to the finals in back to back seasons. His stay in Phoenix was kind of the same except they did make the playoffs in what would be his final full season for them in 2002-03.
But his longing for the Knicks along with the Suns losing made Marbury a pest to management. Zeke eyeing an opportunity to bring a big name to the team, acquired the disgruntled player. Again the Suns improved and the team with Marbury suffered. During the longest stint of his career with one team, Marbury averaged 18.2 points, 7 assists, 2.7 turnovers and 1.2 steals in 287 games. Thomas must've thought that Marbury's homecoming season where he finished with 19.8 points per game and had a 3:1 turnover would be a good sign. However, this was a sign that the worst was coming for both these guys.
Let's start with August 2, 2005, one of the worst days to be a New York Knick. Jerome James had a career year in the 2005 playoffs averaging 12.5 points, 6.8 rebounds and 1.8 blocks in 11 games. Despite posting a 5.1 point, 2.1 rebound and 1.3 block average in 252 games for Seattle, James helped get himself a lucrative deal. And thanks to Zeke, he got his payday with a 5 year $29 million deal. James would average 3.1 points and 2.1 rebounds in his first season.
Sadly, he was not any more productive. James' averaged 2.5 points, 1.8 rebounds and 0.6 blocks during his 89 games. What's sad is that when Thomas became the coach, he was a benchwarmer and with Mike D'Antoni, he was nowhere to be found.
The sign and trade of Eddy Curry later on would be an insurance policy. Curry was part of the baby Bulls era where he and Tyson Chandler were going to be the next Twin Towers of the NBA. Curry turned out to be an underachiever throughout his time in Chicago. He averaged 11.8 points, 0.9 blocks and 4.9 rebounds in 289 games. While it looked like Curry was making a turnaround in 2004-05 season averaging 16.1 points and 5.4 rebounds a game, something bad happened. It turned out that he had heart issues. The Bulls wanted him to get a DNA test to see if his condition was congenital, but Curry refused. Did that stop Thomas...NOOOO!!!
Curry who felt like he was going to get screwed by management decided to give the Knicks a chance. So they arranged an sign and trade deal worth $56 million over 6 years and was dealt on October 24th. While he looked like he was improved at times, he was still as inconsistent as was with the Bulls. In 2006-07, Curry started and played in all but one game and averaged 19.5 points and 7 rebounds. For the 222 games he played for New York, he averaged 15.2 points and 5.8 rebounds. But he saw a decline in playing time and proved he was still a defensive liability.
Jared Jeffries just like Thomas was an Indiana Hoosier. And just like Zeke he played in the national championship. So when the Wizards selected Jeffries as the 11th overall pick in 2002, they had hopes that he was going to be something special. He just turned out to be a decent player that was injury prone. In the 2004-05 season, Jeffries averaged 6.8 points and 2.9 rebounds in 77 games. But it was the following season that caught Thomas's eye. He played in the same number of games but started 6 more games. His numbers did take a slight dip, but it was in the playoffs that Jeffries began to shine. In the 2006 playoffs he averaged 8 points and 6.2 rebounds in 6 games.
So that prompted Zeke to sign Jeffries for 5 years $30 million. While he was a restricted free agent, the Wizards decided to let the Knicks have him. Unfortunately, the story was the same for Jeffries. He had a hard time staying healthy, but when he was, he worked hard. In 2008-09 he averaged 8.1 points and pulled down 6.3 rebounds in 56 games.
Hopefully I made my point about the owners being liable for this strike happening. People will say if the players weren't so greedy about taking these huge contracts, then this would not be happening. But do you expect the players NOT to pass up that kind of opportunity? If you do, then you must be having the best time in Imaginationland. A lot of people would love to get a multi-million dollar contract to be unproductive. But make sure you work hard and maybe you'll be the lucky one.
Like I said before, to be a dynasty, everyone on the team needs to be on the same page. On top of that, owners need to quit giving loads of money to talent that won't give their teams a prosperous return in their investment. It's always a crapshoot finding talent that will make the team better, but COME ON!!! You people have the money, find some personnel that knows how to recruit talent and hire them. And also, don't be afraid to pay your players their fair market value.
Sunday, June 26, 2011
North American Leagues Midterm Grades
Here is how bad or good each league with teams have done so far. I'M TALKING TO YOU GUYS!!!
NFL: F
I just had to be that guy and ask, "How could it be any worse?" Look at it this way, just when I thought Brett Favre would finally retire that the NFL can finally move on to the next issue. Sadly, ESPN's constant name placement of Favre, whether it was in praise or disgrace, will be missed. Why you might ask? Well...
Yes, I'm talking about the lockout. This whole debacle with the CBA has been going on for the last two years when the owners decided to opt out. But it finally came to a head when the new year began. The NFLPA and the team owners had ample time to find a solution that works for everyone. And now that the union has decertified and a lockout is now in effect, time will tell if the negotiations will actually work.
While the Green Bay Packers won their first Super Bowl in the post Brett Favre era, the fact that the eventual players strike was taking center stage pretty much ruined any hope for a passing grade at this point. Despite hearing positive news that the lockout could come to end in light of the players and the owners coming to an agreement. It's just speculation. And until it's official and the season can be saved, the F will stand.
NCAA: D+
The BCS is a beautiful disaster. The ranking system is a complete crapshoot, yet when the national title game comes around, you just got to see it. But we'll have to wait until I get to football to factor them into the equation.
We got to see the road to the Final Four go from 65 to 68. Virginia Commonwealth goes from the First Four to the Final Four. And we got to see Butler in the championship game once again. But the title game was just awful. With that they receive an 85.
Lacrosse has been scandalized at least a couple times if not more. At least this year, the sport made up for it this year, especially making a top 10 highlight (courtesy Maryland). That looks like a solid 95.
The World Series looks pretty good. The new TD Ameritrade Park in Omaha looks great. The only thing wrong this season was Arizona State making the postseason. If their appeal doesn't hold up...well, you know. Bonus points to the Cal donors. The Golden Bears may not have had a next year, but thanks to the donors, there should be plenty of more trips to Omaha to come. That comes to another 90 (includes the bonus points).
Hockey. Don't know much about it. I guess by default they get a 100.
But here comes the football programs. While I'm excited about the upcoming season, the scandals have just inflicted quite a bit of damage. Ohio State and their dirty laundry getting aired out. West Virginia and their little internal spy game. And did I forget to mention the BCS? That's a big zero.
The final tally 74.
NBA: C
Overall, it was great to be a fan of the NBA. Unless you're a Rockets fan. They maintain a winning record for the second straight season and still can't buy a trip to the postseason. Other than the Heat being the villains of everyone, Phil Jackson not getting his 3rd shot at a three-peat and Shaq retiring, this season has been great. Sounds like an easy A, doesn't it?
Just like the NFL, the NBA is having labor unrest. It may not be as extreme as the aforementioned, but with the CBA expiring in the next few days, who's to say it won't be. This is the second time a commissioner has been jeered on stage during the draft. If this lockout happens, it will be the second time under David Stern's watch that it has happened. Stay tuned.
NHL: B+
I know a lot of people like to rip hockey, but it's a very entertaining sport. This year was no exception. Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals did very well in the ratings. Even with the usual suspensions, fines and other infractions that are part of the game on and off the ice. Not a bad year at all.
Lest we forget the riots that took place in Vancouver when the Boston Bruins beat the Canucks. Which hurts the NHL's image in that aspect. But here's where I give them the benefit of the doubt. A) The home team won every game, so it would make sense to be pissed off. B) It's happened before. Remember the 94 Finals against the Rangers in 7. C) It's been 18 years since a Canadian team has hoisted Lord Stanley. And D) The riots did have a warm and fuzzy moment or two.
MLB: A-
So far, so good. As long as there is Ozzie Guillen or a David Ortiz instead of another Manny Ramirez, the game should do fine. Of course having Jack McKeon and Davey Johnson back in the managerial role just made this season quite interesting.
If only they could keep anyone associated with the Mitchell Report out of the news, they could've gotten an A+.
MLS: A+
The only thing I could say is less is more. It's still a young league, so it's too early to tell if a scandal will shake this league to its core.
Despite the usual trash talking before and after a match, it's just another day at the office.
Playing for a tie would be considered un-American to most folks. I guess we should all have an open mind when it comes to difference.
NFL: F
I just had to be that guy and ask, "How could it be any worse?" Look at it this way, just when I thought Brett Favre would finally retire that the NFL can finally move on to the next issue. Sadly, ESPN's constant name placement of Favre, whether it was in praise or disgrace, will be missed. Why you might ask? Well...
Yes, I'm talking about the lockout. This whole debacle with the CBA has been going on for the last two years when the owners decided to opt out. But it finally came to a head when the new year began. The NFLPA and the team owners had ample time to find a solution that works for everyone. And now that the union has decertified and a lockout is now in effect, time will tell if the negotiations will actually work.
While the Green Bay Packers won their first Super Bowl in the post Brett Favre era, the fact that the eventual players strike was taking center stage pretty much ruined any hope for a passing grade at this point. Despite hearing positive news that the lockout could come to end in light of the players and the owners coming to an agreement. It's just speculation. And until it's official and the season can be saved, the F will stand.
NCAA: D+
The BCS is a beautiful disaster. The ranking system is a complete crapshoot, yet when the national title game comes around, you just got to see it. But we'll have to wait until I get to football to factor them into the equation.
We got to see the road to the Final Four go from 65 to 68. Virginia Commonwealth goes from the First Four to the Final Four. And we got to see Butler in the championship game once again. But the title game was just awful. With that they receive an 85.
Lacrosse has been scandalized at least a couple times if not more. At least this year, the sport made up for it this year, especially making a top 10 highlight (courtesy Maryland). That looks like a solid 95.
The World Series looks pretty good. The new TD Ameritrade Park in Omaha looks great. The only thing wrong this season was Arizona State making the postseason. If their appeal doesn't hold up...well, you know. Bonus points to the Cal donors. The Golden Bears may not have had a next year, but thanks to the donors, there should be plenty of more trips to Omaha to come. That comes to another 90 (includes the bonus points).
Hockey. Don't know much about it. I guess by default they get a 100.
But here comes the football programs. While I'm excited about the upcoming season, the scandals have just inflicted quite a bit of damage. Ohio State and their dirty laundry getting aired out. West Virginia and their little internal spy game. And did I forget to mention the BCS? That's a big zero.
The final tally 74.
NBA: C
Overall, it was great to be a fan of the NBA. Unless you're a Rockets fan. They maintain a winning record for the second straight season and still can't buy a trip to the postseason. Other than the Heat being the villains of everyone, Phil Jackson not getting his 3rd shot at a three-peat and Shaq retiring, this season has been great. Sounds like an easy A, doesn't it?
Just like the NFL, the NBA is having labor unrest. It may not be as extreme as the aforementioned, but with the CBA expiring in the next few days, who's to say it won't be. This is the second time a commissioner has been jeered on stage during the draft. If this lockout happens, it will be the second time under David Stern's watch that it has happened. Stay tuned.
NHL: B+
I know a lot of people like to rip hockey, but it's a very entertaining sport. This year was no exception. Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals did very well in the ratings. Even with the usual suspensions, fines and other infractions that are part of the game on and off the ice. Not a bad year at all.
Lest we forget the riots that took place in Vancouver when the Boston Bruins beat the Canucks. Which hurts the NHL's image in that aspect. But here's where I give them the benefit of the doubt. A) The home team won every game, so it would make sense to be pissed off. B) It's happened before. Remember the 94 Finals against the Rangers in 7. C) It's been 18 years since a Canadian team has hoisted Lord Stanley. And D) The riots did have a warm and fuzzy moment or two.
MLB: A-
So far, so good. As long as there is Ozzie Guillen or a David Ortiz instead of another Manny Ramirez, the game should do fine. Of course having Jack McKeon and Davey Johnson back in the managerial role just made this season quite interesting.
If only they could keep anyone associated with the Mitchell Report out of the news, they could've gotten an A+.
MLS: A+
The only thing I could say is less is more. It's still a young league, so it's too early to tell if a scandal will shake this league to its core.
Despite the usual trash talking before and after a match, it's just another day at the office.
Playing for a tie would be considered un-American to most folks. I guess we should all have an open mind when it comes to difference.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)